Bill Review
When billed charges are driving claim value as much as underlying liability, bill review is essential. Criterion matches your file to a bill review professional whose experience fits the case — not just the category.
When the bill is as disputed as the injury.
In personal injury, workers' compensation, and medical malpractice litigation, the damages number is often driven less by what happened to the plaintiff and more by what was billed for treating it. Bill review addresses that directly.
A bill review professional examines the medical bills submitted as damages — line by line — and evaluates whether the charges are reasonable, medically necessary, and consistent with the services actually provided. They identify billing issues that inflate the claimed damages number and produce a written report that quantifies the appropriate value of the bills at issue.
Criterion reviews your case type and all file specifics before matching you with a bill review professional. The match is not made by specialty category alone — we look at the specific procedures billed, the care setting, the applicable fee schedule or reasonable value standard in the relevant jurisdiction, and the reviewer's track record with comparable files. That specificity is what separates a useful bill review from a generic one.
"A bill review is most valuable when the gap between what was billed and what was reasonable is significant enough to matter at settlement or trial — and most cases involving hospital charges, surgical procedures, or extended treatment have exactly that gap."
Bill review is frequently used alongside peer review or IME, since both the medical necessity of the treatment and the reasonableness of what was charged may be at issue simultaneously. Criterion can coordinate all three services concurrently when the case calls for it.
Common billing issues that affect damages
These are the categories of billing problems that a qualified bill review professional evaluates and documents in the written report.
From case intake to written report
Criterion manages the matching and coordination. You provide the case details and billing records — we handle the rest.
Deliverables for every bill review engagement
-
Reviewer credentials and match rationalePrior to the review beginning, you receive the reviewer's credentials and the basis for their selection — including their relevant experience with the procedure types and billing context in your case.
-
Line-item billing analysisA detailed analysis of the billing records submitted, evaluated against applicable fee schedules, procedure code guidelines, and the reasonable value standard for the jurisdiction.
-
Reasonable value determinationA documented opinion on the reasonable value of the services billed — the number that should be used as the damages baseline rather than the billed amount, supported by the reviewer's analysis and methodology.
-
Identification of specific billing issuesA categorized list of billing problems identified — upcoding, unbundling, duplication, charges above reasonable value, and any other issues that support a reduction in the claimed damages number.
-
Written report structured for litigation useThe final report is structured to support settlement negotiations and, where the reviewer is retained as a testifying expert, to meet the requirements for expert opinion disclosure.
Cases where bill review changes the damages number
- High-bill personal injury cases where hospital charges, surgical fees, or extended treatment costs are driving the claimed damages significantly above what the injury mechanism would typically support.
- Cases involving hospital liens where the lien amount substantially exceeds what a health insurer would have negotiated — and the defense or plaintiff needs documentation of appropriate lien value.
- Workers' compensation defense where medical cost containment is a litigation priority and the billed amounts exceed the applicable fee schedule.
- Medical malpractice cases where the claimed cost of remedial treatment or ongoing care is a significant component of the damages claim.
- Cases where the same treating provider billed for services across multiple settings — emergency, inpatient, outpatient follow-up — and the aggregate billing warrants consolidated review.
- Defense matters where a damages expert on the plaintiff's side has relied on billed amounts rather than reasonable value, and the defense needs an offsetting expert opinion.
- Any case where you are simultaneously conducting peer review or IME — bill review coordinates naturally with both and produces a more complete damages picture.
Bill review works best alongside these
Criterion coordinates all three services concurrently when the case calls for it.
Ready to request a bill review?
Submit your case and billing records. Criterion will match you with the right reviewer and confirm turnaround within 1 business day.